Skip to content

Browser Use alternative

Browsentic vs Browser Use: a side panel for your signed-in browser, no code to write

Browser Use is a library: your code builds an agent that drives a browser it launches. Browsentic is a side panel whose agent drives the browser you are already signed in to. Browser Use suits software you are building; Browsentic suits work you are doing yourself.

At a glance

What each one is

Browser Use

A library that gives your code a browser agent

  • A Python and TypeScript package: you construct an agent, give it a task and a model, and run it
  • It drives a Chromium it launches over the DevTools protocol, reading the DOM and screenshots together
  • Open source, with a metered cloud that runs browsers for you with proxies and CAPTCHA solving
  • Built for software that automates the web: pipelines, scrapers, products, many runs in parallel

Browsentic

A side panel that drives the browser you are signed in to

  • A side panel you type or speak into, beside the tab you are looking at
  • It drives your real tab, so the session, the cookies and the two-factor state are the ones you already have
  • Runs the agent CLI you already have, so there is no model key to paste and no token bill to watch
  • Apache 2.0 licensed, on your machine, with approvals in front of anything consequential

Side by side

Feature comparison

Checked against the browser-use repository and browser-use.com, September 2026. If something here is out of date, open an issue.

Browsentic Browser Use
The shape of it
What it is A side panel in your browser, plus Browsentic Bridge on your computer A package you import and write code against
How you drive it Say or type it in the panel Write a script and run it
The browser Your real, open, logged-in tab A Chromium it launches, or one in its cloud
Logins Already yours: nothing is re-authenticated You supply cookies or stored state, or sign in each run
Model keys None: it spawns the CLI you signed in to You bring an API key, and pay per token
What it costs Nothing beyond the agent subscription you already have Free to self host, plus tokens; cloud browsers metered by the minute
License Apache 2.0 Open source, on GitHub
What it is for
Interactive work The point: you watch it on a timeline and approve as it goes Possible, but you are writing code to do it
Many runs in parallel Several tabs and agents in one browser, on one machine The point: fan out across cloud browsers
Headless and CI No: it needs your real browser open Yes, and that is the normal way to run it
Proxies and CAPTCHA No: it is your browser, on your connection Yes, in the cloud tier
Composing into your own software Through MCP, or not at all Yes: it is a library
Trust
Credentials Sealed into placeholders; the agent never sees plaintext Whatever your script passes it
Approvals A declarative policy, every rule tunable, per-site grants Yours to implement
Where page text goes To the agent on your machine, marked untrusted To whichever model API you configured
Show it a job once Recordings: do it yourself, later say “do it like last time” Write the script

Browsentic only

What Browsentic does that Browser Use does not

Your own signed-in session

Nothing is re-authenticated in a throwaway profile, so the banks, intranets and single sign-on that would stop a fresh Chromium never come up.

No code to write

A job is one sentence in the panel. There is no agent to construct, no model to choose in code, and nothing to deploy.

No token bill

It starts the CLI you already subscribe to, so a long job costs what your existing plan costs. There is no API key anywhere in the product.

Approvals in the panel

Form submission, file upload and leaving the run’s sites pause in the panel and say what they are about to do. That matters more when the browser holds your real accounts.

Show it once, or let it learn the site

Record a job yourself and replay it later, or point it at a site and let it map itself. Both become skills you read before you arm them.

Optional MCP access

To use it from your own tooling, Browsentic Bridge serves MCP over stdio, so Claude Code, Cursor or Zed can drive the paired tab without you writing a client.

Browser Use only

What Browser Use does that Browsentic does not

Some of these are good reasons to choose Browser Use.

It scales

Hundreds of browsers in parallel, headless, in CI, behind proxies. Browsentic drives one browser: the one in front of you, and only while it is open.

It is a library

It composes into your own software: your control flow, your retries, your storage. Browsentic is an application, and the side panel is its interface.

Vision as well as structure

Browser Use pairs the DOM with screenshots so it can find a control that has no usable markup. Browsentic leans on a layout diagram with stable selectors, and takes screenshots when asked.

A managed cloud

Browsers by the minute, with residential proxies and CAPTCHA solving, so a scraping job is somebody else’s infrastructure problem. Browsentic has no hosted anything.

The short version

Which to choose

Browser Use

Pick Browser Use if you are building software that automates the web: many runs, headless, in CI, at a scale no person is sitting in front of.

Browsentic

Pick Browsentic for your own work in your own accounts: one browser, already signed in, driven from a side panel, with approvals before anything that commits.

They do not overlap much. A team can reasonably run Browser Use in its pipelines and Browsentic on the laptops, and neither one gets in the other’s way.

Give your browser a superpower.

Free and open source under Apache 2.0, with no API key, subscription or account. One line installs Browsentic Bridge and opens the extension’s store page. Nothing connects until you pair the two.